The Pedos Turning Trans to Hide Their Past
We've Lost the Identities of Nearly 1,000 Paedophiles With New Birth Certificates
When Ceri-Lee Galvin’s abusive, incestuous father, Clive Bundy, was arrested, she thought her nightmare was finally over. Little did she know that it would take a brutal and dystopian turn.
What he did to his daughter continuously - even involving other paedophiles - merits a life sentence. I’m not for the death penalty because I worry it could be misused. But I see no reason not to employ it with Clive. I don’t say that with hyperbole - I’d be intrigued to hear the argument against it.
Given the depravity of his crimes and the danger to others who come across him, he has given up his right to life - and yet, we have afforded him an extraordinary reprieve - a blank slate unavailable to 99.9% of the population.
He was supposed to face at least ten years behind bars, but after serving just five, the victim liaison officer contacted Ceri-Lee to tell her they were considering letting him loose.
What followed was the most bizarre and painful phone call of her life.
“I was like, ‘What do you mean?’” she told me. “I was in shock.”
But that was nothing compared to what followed:
Gender Reprieve!
“Just to let you know,” added the victim liaison officer nonchalantly, “he’s given us permission for you to know that he’s now Claire Fox. He’s a woman.”
“That must have been a shock,” I replied.
Not to the liaison officer, to whom this was apparently banal. Perhaps they’re used to monstrous, incestuous paedophiles deciding that they are women in prison.
“It was like she was telling me what she had for breakfast,” said Ceri-Lee.
Before I get into the absurdity of the situation and the dangers it causes to children, I want to press a point we must not lose sight of amid the madness. The conversations between a victim liaison officer and a victim such as Ceri-Lee should be handled with extreme care.
They are sacred.
The victim has a right to expect support, understanding and - as a minimum requirement - honesty. But they told her that the man - her father - who used his male appendage to do to her the most brutal thing imaginable is a woman.
This is a cruel and unforgivable lie.
These are the people and systems we put in place to protect our most vulnerable.
Think of that.
The Fallacious “Rights” Argument
A common fallacious argument about trans - one repeated by trans rights activist Peter Tatchell when he was on Heretics - is that gender realists are trying to take rights away from trans people. “Trans rights are human rights,” goes the motto, although nobody explains which human rights trans people lack.
The opposite is true. Trans activists are seeking - and getting - extra rights for those who say that they are the opposite sex. For example, Clive received a wig and make-up at taxpayer expense. This is not available to actual women in our prisons.
Clive was then segregated from the rest of the prisoners, treated with extra compassion and kindness, and - from what Ceri-Lee has gathered - able to put out the story that he only did what he did (the horrendous crimes against his own daughter) because he was struggling with his gender identity.
That’s right - Clive is the real victim here. And it is believed to have led to his early release.
Worse still is that Clive changed his name to Claire Fox - the name of a prominent free speech advocate - in the clearest example of trolling since Roxie Tickle (who successfully took my former guest Sall Grover to court for access to her women-only app Giggle.
These men are taking the piss. Or perhaps they’re not - perhaps (well, quite certainly) these men are mentally ill. Either way, this is the exploitation of lax gender rules that Tatchell told me ‘does not happen’.
But despite the trolling and madness, this is very real and serious - not only for Ceri-Lee but for children across the UK. That’s because people who claim that they are trans can get a brand new birth certificate.
This is shocking.
Pushback IGNORED
Not enough people are aware of this despite the ongoing heroic efforts by the likes of my former guest, Dr Kate Coleman (below, my interview with her) of Keep Prisons Single Sex, who have passionately rallied against this madness for years. With a new birth certificate, sex offenders who say they are trans can have their criminal record wiped.
Actually, it’s not wiped. It just isn’t. There is simply no trace of criminal behaviour before their name change. It is a criminal offence not to make the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) aware of crimes committed in a former name or gender.
But doing so wouldn’t make the top 1,000 in the crimes that Clive was willing to commit. So what would incentivise him to divulge his history? We are asking paedophiles to be honest about their crimes. Does no one see the problem with that?
This is why Clive, Ceri-Lee tells me, has been seen hanging around children in libraries multiple times. His access to children would likely be cut off, if he were honest on his DBS records.
This takes us back to the nature of trans ideology, which is at its core the pursuit of extra rights. You won’t then be surprised to learn that this same loophole cannot be exploited by non-trans people who change their name.
They don’t have this right.
We have a situation whereby a monstrous paedophile can wipe his history by changing his name - the old one no longer exists - because he says he is trans. But his victim Ceri-Lee Galvin - who changed her surname to escape her rapist - cannot do the same. She is forced to relive his ordeal whenever employers check on her and ask why she changed her name.
This is far from a one-off. Police in the UK lost 729 sex offenders between 2019 and 2021 simply because they changed their names.
Nor is it a quirk of the UK.
The most shocking case I’ve come across is
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Heretics with Andrew Gold to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.